telegram-create-poll

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-read-only (readOnlyHint=false) and open-world side effects (openWorldHint=true). The description adds that the poll can be multiple choice or quiz mode, which is useful context beyond annotations. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, short sentence that immediately conveys the tool's purpose. It is concise and front-loaded, with no unnecessary words or redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has 6 parameters (3 required) and no output schema. The description is minimal and does not mention prerequisites (e.g., bot permissions), error handling, or what the tool returns. While the schema covers parameters, the lack of output schema means the agent has no information about the return value or confirmation of success.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for all 6 parameters. The description adds little beyond the schema, merely mentioning 'multiple choice or quiz mode' which is covered by the quiz and multipleChoice parameters. The description does not further clarify parameter usage or relationships.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a poll in a Telegram chat (multiple choice or quiz mode)', specifying the verb (create), resource (poll), and scope (in a Telegram chat) with mode differentiation. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like close-poll, vote-poll, and get-poll-results.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies when to use the tool (to create a poll) but does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use it or mention alternatives. For example, it doesn't suggest using vote-poll or get-poll-results for other poll-related actions. No when-not or alternative hints are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.