othos_ticket_list_by_column_template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description must fully disclose behavioral traits. It only states it lists tickets with specific fields, but does not mention side effects, permissions required, pagination, or whether it is read-only. The read-only nature is implied but not explicit.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence that conveys the core purpose efficiently without extraneous words. It is front-loaded with the action and resource.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema and no annotations, the description is too sparse. It does not explain what the output looks like, how the template works, or typical use cases. For a listing tool, more context about the return format or sorting would be helpful.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With schema coverage at 50%, the description adds minimal meaning beyond the schema. 'columnId' is not described in the schema, and the description only indirectly implies it identifies the column. 'summaryMaxLength' has a schema description, but the tool description does not elaborate further. The description does not compensate for the undocumented parameter.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists tickets from a column with a fixed template including fields like title, priority, id, etc. It distinguishes itself from a sibling tool 'othos_ticket_list_by_column' by mentioning a fixed chat template, but does not explicitly differentiate when to use which.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus other list tools like 'othos_ticket_list_by_column' or when not to use it. The description lacks context about prerequisites or alternative approaches.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.