Skip to main content
Glama

Get transcript

get_transcript
Read-only

Retrieve a project's timestamped transcript, optionally within a time range, to pick moments for create_clip. Output is truncated at maxChars with a note on where to continue.

Instructions

The project's transcript as timed lines "[m:ss] text", optionally only a time range. Returns text; output longer than maxChars is cut with a note saying which fromSec to continue from. Use it to pick your own moments for create_clip.

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesProject id (from list_projects, search_clips or create_project)
toSecNoEnd of the range, seconds
fromSecNoStart of the range, seconds from the start of the video
maxCharsNoCut the output at this many characters (1000-200000, default 60000)

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed4 schema fields changedv0.7.0
    • addedInput schema / properties / fromSec / description
      Added value: +"Start of the range, seconds from the start of the video"
    • addedInput schema / properties / id / description
      Added value: +"Project id (from list_projects, search_clips or create_project)"
    • addedInput schema / properties / maxChars / description
      Added value: +"Cut the output at this many characters (1000-200000, default 60000)"
    • addedInput schema / properties / toSec / description
      Added value: +"End of the range, seconds"
  2. First observedv0.1.0

TDQS

A4.1/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, so safe read is covered. The description adds valuable behavior: the truncation policy ('output longer than maxChars is cut with a note saying which fromSec to continue from') and the return format, which goes beyond the annotation's safety hint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three focused sentences with no waste, front-loading the output format and then covering the truncation behavior and the recommended use case. Slightly dense but well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only transcript tool with no output schema, the description covers the return format, truncation behavior, and downstream use case. It is nearly complete, though it could mention whether the range is clamped to video length or how missing projects are handled.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already fully documents all 4 parameters. The description mentions the time range and maxChars truncation, but adds no syntax or format details beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate when the schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb+resource ('transcript') and describes the exact output format ('[m:ss] text' timed lines). It also distinguishes it from siblings by naming create_clip as the downstream use case.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly tells the agent 'Use it to pick your own moments for create_clip', giving a clear use case. However, it doesn't state when NOT to use it or name an alternative for retrieving transcript text in a different way.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.