react_get_constraints
List all forbidden React and Next.js patterns with explanations for why they are prohibited.
Instructions
List all forbidden React/Next.js patterns and their reasons
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
List all forbidden React and Next.js patterns with explanations for why they are prohibited.
List all forbidden React/Next.js patterns and their reasons
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description clearly indicates a read-only listing operation. Without annotations, it adequately conveys the tool's non-destructive nature.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
Single sentence, front-loaded with purpose, no unnecessary words.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Tool has no parameters and no output schema; description sufficiently explains what it returns ('forbidden patterns and their reasons').
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
No parameters exist, so the description adds no additional meaning beyond the schema. Baseline of 4 applies.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (list), the target (forbidden React/Next.js patterns), and what it returns (their reasons). It distinguishes from sibling tools like react_get_pattern which cover positive patterns.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description implies usage when needing to see prohibited patterns, but does not explicitly state when to use or provide comparisons to alternatives.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/orkait/hyperstack'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server