Skip to main content
Glama
orancummins

Open Finance US MCP

by orancummins

Related Servers

Alternatives to Open Finance US MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      An MCP server that exposes Enable Banking API tools for interacting with bank accounts through Open Banking. It enables users to authenticate sessions, list accounts, and fetch transaction history or balances via a secure self-hosted server.
      2
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for read-only access to bank accounts via Open Banking (DSP2/AIS). It retrieves balances, transactions, and forecasts upcoming debits to prevent overdrafts, with optional daily Todoist briefs.
      6
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Self-hosted MCP server that securely connects your bank accounts via Enable Banking, offering read-only access to balances and transactions for AI assistants.
      12
      735 npm
      238
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A lightweight MCP server that simulates financial data interactions with dummy authentication and static JSON datasets for testing financial applications.
      2
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for personal finance via Open Finance, consolidating accounts and cards and answering spending questions with aggregated numbers. Provides tools for category spending, recurring subscriptions, budgets, card bills, and installment forecasts, with data stored locally in an encrypted SQLite database.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A read-only MCP server that exposes Turkish open banking data (accounts, balances, transactions, cash flow, and cards) to AI agents via the ÖHVPS 2.0.0 standard.
      5
      MIT

    TDQS

    C2.8/5.0

    Scored across 62 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct resource and action, with clear differentiation even among similar operations (e.g., generate_voi_report vs generate_voa_report). Overlapping concepts like payment indicators are separated by FCRA vs non-FCRA. No two tools have ambiguous boundaries.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case, with verbs like create, get, list, delete, generate, refresh, etc. There are no mixed conventions or inconsistent verb styles. A clear, predictable naming scheme throughout.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 62 tools, this server far exceeds the typical well-scoped range of 3-15. While the domain is broad, the quantity is overwhelming for a single MCP server and could hinder agent navigation. A more modular split would improve coherence.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of customers, accounts, transactions, reports, institutions, consumers, payment indicators, micro-deposits, businesses, and testing utilities. There are no obvious gaps; every core open banking operation is represented.

    Maintenance

    ActivityStale
    ResponsivenessNo issues