Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to swimlane-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that exposes Kanboard API functionality to Large Language Models (LLMs), enabling AI assistants to interact with Kanboard project management system.
      2
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables AI assistants like Claude to interact directly with Planka Kanban boards, allowing automated management of projects, tasks, and workflows through conversational interfaces.
      8
      13 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for accessing Productive.io API endpoints (projects, tasks, comments, todos), tailored for read-only operations, providing streamlined access to essential data while minimizing token consumption
      18
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides AI assistants with structured access to kanban board functionality for managing tasks, columns, labels, and sprints.
      5 npm
      2
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct selection criterion or return type: boards, person-based tasks, single task detail, comment search, time entries, and text-based task search. The descriptions explicitly distinguish list_tasks from search_tasks and list_comments, and get_task is the only id-based lookup. No two tools appear to do the same thing.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern: list_*, get_*, and search_*. The conventions are predictable and readable throughout. There are no mixed styles or vague verbs.

    Tool Count5/5

    Six tools is well within the ideal 3-15 range for this domain. Each tool covers a distinct retrieval or search need for KanbanFlow data. No tool feels redundant or unnecessary.

    Completeness3/5

    The read/query surface is thorough: boards, tasks, task details, comments, time entries, and search are all covered. However, there are no create, update, delete, comment-posting, or time-logging tools, which are notable missing lifecycle operations for a KanbanFlow integration. Agents would be unable to modify boards, tasks, or comments through this server.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues