Unofficial bioRxiv MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Unofficial bioRxiv MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints, including metadata, publication status, and submission counts, through natural language or direct tool calls.148 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceSearch and retrieve bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints — by DOI, date interval, or keyword — via MCP.626 npm4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables coding agents to retrieve full text, metadata, and search preprints from bioRxiv, medRxiv, and arXiv via four stdio tools: search_preprints, get_fulltext, get_metadata, and resolve.416 PyPI2BSD 3-Clause
- FlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceBioMCP is an open-source MCP server that connects any AI assistant to 15 open bioinformatics databases with zero configuration. It provides 23 tools for literature, sequences, BLAST, structures, enrichment, annotations, genomes, interactions, variants, domains, compounds, and single-cell data.7323 PyPI12-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenance🔍 Enable AI assistants to search and access bioRxiv papers through a simple MCP interface. The bioRxiv MCP Server provides a bridge between AI assistants and bioRxiv's preprint repository through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It allows AI models to search for biology preprints and access their25-
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenance🔍 Enable AI assistants to search and access medRxiv papers through a simple MCP interface. The medRxiv MCP Server provides a bridge between AI assistants and medRxiv's preprint repository through the Model Context Protocol (MCP). It allows AI models to search for health sciences preprints and acce9-
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with other tools. The tool's description clearly enumerates its methods, so an agent can understand its purpose without ambiguity.
The single tool name 'biorxiv_info' is clear and follows a consistent naming style. Since there are no other tools to contrast with, consistency is trivially high.
A single tool is borderline for a server, but given the narrow scope of bioRxiv/medRxiv access, it can be acceptable. However, it feels thin compared to servers that expose separate tools for distinct operations.
The tool bundles methods covering search, metadata retrieval, category listing, publication status, funder lookup, and statistics. This provides broad coverage of preprint database operations, with no obvious dead ends.