Unofficial bioRxiv MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Unofficial bioRxiv MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables querying bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints, including metadata, publication status, and submission counts, through natural language or direct tool calls.135 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceEnables searching bioRxiv preprints by topic, date window, or field, looking up any DOI's latest version, publication status, journal and retraction flag, browsing the newest preprints, and exporting results or digests as JSON, Markdown, CSV, or BibTeX. All tools return a stable JSON envelope with request metadata and structured error codes.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceSearch and retrieve bioRxiv and medRxiv preprints — by DOI, date interval, or keyword — via MCP.380 npm4Apache 2.0
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables Claude or any MCP client to search and read arXiv, bioRxiv, and medRxiv preprints, including metadata, paged full text, recent listings, and journal-publication checks.7MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceEnables coding agents to retrieve full text, metadata, and search preprints from bioRxiv, medRxiv, and arXiv via four stdio tools: search_preprints, get_fulltext, get_metadata, and resolve.439 PyPI4BSD 3-Clause
- FlicenseBqualityAmaintenanceBioMCP is an open-source MCP server that connects any AI assistant to 15 open bioinformatics databases with zero configuration. It provides 23 tools for literature, sequences, BLAST, structures, enrichment, annotations, genomes, interactions, variants, domains, compounds, and single-cell data.7331 PyPI14-
TDQS
Scored across 1 tool
With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusing it with other tools. The tool's description clearly enumerates its methods, so an agent can understand its purpose without ambiguity.
The single tool name 'biorxiv_info' is clear and follows a consistent naming style. Since there are no other tools to contrast with, consistency is trivially high.
A single tool is borderline for a server, but given the narrow scope of bioRxiv/medRxiv access, it can be acceptable. However, it feels thin compared to servers that expose separate tools for distinct operations.
The tool bundles methods covering search, metadata retrieval, category listing, publication status, funder lookup, and statistics. This provides broad coverage of preprint database operations, with no obvious dead ends.