Skip to main content
Glama

get_value_map_positioning_guide

Generate product positioning guides with value maps, feature extraction, and taglines using Open Strategy Partners methodologies.

Instructions

Get the Open Strategy Partners (OSP) Product Communications Value Map Generation System for Product Positioning (value cases, feature extraction, taglines).

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Implementation Reference

  • Handler function for the 'get_value_map_positioning_guide' tool. Decorated with @mcp.tool() for registration. Reads and returns the content of 'product-value-map-llm.md' or an error if not found.
    @mcp.tool()
    async def get_value_map_positioning_guide() -> dict:
        """Get the Open Strategy Partners (OSP) Product Communications Value Map Generation System for Product Positioning (value cases, feature extraction, taglines)."""
        script_dir = os.path.dirname(os.path.abspath(__file__))
        try:
            with open(os.path.join(script_dir, 'product-value-map-llm.md'), 'r') as f:
                content = f.read()
                return {
                    "success": True,
                    "data": {
                        "content": content
                    }
                }
        except FileNotFoundError:
            return {
                "success": False,
                "error": "Required file 'product-value-map-llm.md' not found in script directory"
            }
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden of behavioral disclosure. It states the tool 'gets' a system, implying a read-only operation, but doesn't clarify aspects like authentication needs, rate limits, response format, or potential side effects. For a tool with zero annotation coverage, this leaves significant gaps in understanding its behavior.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that front-loads the key action ('Get') and resource. It avoids unnecessary words, though it could be slightly more structured by separating the system name from its purpose for clarity. Overall, it's appropriately sized with minimal waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (simple retrieval with no parameters), no annotations, and no output schema, the description is adequate but incomplete. It specifies what is retrieved but lacks details on the return format, usage context, or behavioral traits. For a tool with minimal structured data, it meets a basic threshold but leaves room for improvement.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The tool has 0 parameters, and schema description coverage is 100%, so there are no parameters to document. The description doesn't need to add parameter semantics, but it does specify what is being retrieved (the OSP system), which aligns with the lack of inputs. A baseline of 4 is appropriate for zero-parameter tools.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool's purpose: retrieving a specific system (OSP Product Communications Value Map Generation System) for product positioning tasks like value cases, feature extraction, and taglines. It uses a specific verb ('Get') and identifies the resource, though it doesn't explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'get_meta_guide' or 'get_writing_guide' beyond naming the system.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It mentions the system's purpose (product positioning) but doesn't specify contexts, prerequisites, or exclusions, nor does it reference sibling tools for comparison. Usage is implied by the name and description alone.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/open-strategy-partners/osp_marketing_tools'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server