Skip to main content
Glama
Sign In
open-strategy-partners

OSP Marketing Tools MCP Server

by open-strategy-partners
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to OSP Marketing Tools MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • auto-mcp-server

      alanbuxton
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables LLMs to interact with any REST API that has an OpenAPI specification by providing a lightweight MCP server that translates between natural language and API calls.
      MIT

    • Ollama MCP Server

      claudiayoung104
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible applications to interact with local and cloud-hosted LLM models for model management, text generation, chat, embeddings, and web search/fetch.
      958 npm
      AGPL 3.0

    • Ollama MCP Server

      orlov4069
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible applications to manage and use local or cloud LLM models through comprehensive SDK tools, including model management, text generation, chat with tool support, embeddings, and web search/fetch.
      958 npm
      AGPL 3.0

    • Ollama MCP Server

      hcho43
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP-compatible applications to manage, run, chat with, and generate embeddings from local or cloud LLM models, and to perform web search and content fetching via cloud APIs.
      958 npm
      AGPL 3.0
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    B3.4/5.0

    Scored across 6 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool has a clearly distinct purpose targeting specific documentation or guides (editing codes, meta guide, SEO guide, value map, writing guide, health check). There is no overlap in functionality, making it easy for an agent to select the correct tool without confusion.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun pattern with 'get_' prefix for documentation retrieval tools and a clear descriptive noun (e.g., get_editing_codes, get_meta_guide). The health_check tool also fits a standard naming convention, maintaining uniformity throughout the set.

    Tool Count4/5

    With 6 tools, the count is reasonable and well-scoped for a marketing documentation server, covering key areas like editing, SEO, and positioning. It's slightly lean but appropriate, as each tool serves a distinct purpose without redundancy.

    Completeness3/5

    The tool set provides comprehensive retrieval for various marketing guides, but it lacks CRUD operations (e.g., create or update guides) and other lifecycle actions. This is a notable gap, as agents can only get information without modifying or interacting beyond basic health checks.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessUnresponsive

    Resources