Skip to main content
Glama
omari91

grid-screen-mcp

by omari91

Related Servers

Alternatives to grid-screen-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI assistants to compile distribution feeders, run power flow, voltage and thermal violation checks, short-circuit and Thévenin impedance studies, hosting capacity and QSTS analyses, and add or edit elements, through 20 typed tools that return structured JSON or Markdown with the inputs that produced the results.
      20
      MIT
    • A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Connects AI agents to energy infrastructure with 30+ tools for managing sites, assets, dispatch, settlements, compliance, and carbon tracking.
      34
      31 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables conversational power system analysis by connecting Claude AI with EPRI's OpenDSS simulator. Allows distribution planning engineers to perform sophisticated electrical grid studies through natural language instead of complex scripting.
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables multi-agent orchestration of distributed energy resources through MCP tools, including simulation, real-time telemetry, dispatch control, and deterministic safety gatekeeping for grid support and demand response.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides deterministic, standards-based calculations for data center critical power infrastructure. Enables site selection, generator sizing, UPS sizing, NFPA 110 compliance, and more via 50+ AI agents and 8 compound chains.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to drive a real, licensed PSCAD 5.x installation through its Automation Library: connecting and checking out license certificates, creating projects, placing and wiring components, setting parameters, building and running simulations, and reading back result traces. All 45 tools return structured JSON with real error details so agents can diagnose licensing, wiring, or parameter failures.
      -

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Most tools have clearly distinct roles: catalog lookup, connection-point inspection, regime classification, Tier-1 screening, Tier-2 AC study, mitigation proposal, end-to-end triage, and capacity sweep. There is some overlap between `screen_connection_application` and manually chaining `run_tier1_screen` / `run_tier2_ac_study`, and `search_tools` is a meta-tool that stands apart from the domain workflow, but descriptions make the progressive-fidelity boundaries understandable.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools use snake_case with a clear verb-first pattern such as `list_networks`, `inspect_connection_point`, `classify_screening_regime`, `run_tier1_screen`, and `propose_mitigations`. Tier and domain qualifiers are used consistently enough that the naming remains predictable.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools are well scoped for a grid-screening server, with each covering a distinct stage from catalog discovery through screening, detailed study, mitigation, end-to-end triage, and capacity sweep. The set is neither thin nor bloated.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: network catalog, PCC inspection, regime classification, fast and detailed screening, mitigation synthesis, end-to-end application screening, and hosting-capacity sweep. Minor gaps remain around explicit artifact/result retrieval or standalone audit/export operations, though the end-to-end tool returns audit receipts and resource URIs.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues