Skip to main content
Glama
omardaaboul

EU Tender MCP

by omardaaboul
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to EU Tender MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • LexSocket MCP Server

      lexsocket
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables search and analysis of European public procurement tenders, including EU above-threshold (TED) and below-threshold from 11 national sources, with hybrid search and filtering.
      MIT

    • cerebro-mcp

      benjixone
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables searching and analyzing government tenders, contract awards, and pre-tender pipelines from 21 official sources, with tools for tender search, award intelligence, and detailed notice retrieval.
      MIT

    • Tender MCP

      OjasKord
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to find, score, and monitor government contract opportunities across UK, EU, and US with AI-powered relevance scoring.
      2
      75 npm
      1
      MIT
    • @pipeworx/eu-funding-tenders by pipeworx-io

      @pipeworx/eu-funding-tendersofficial

      pipeworx-io
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables searching and retrieving detailed information on EU grant calls and tenders from the EU Funding & Tenders Portal, including deadlines, budgets, and topic details.
      8 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 7 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a distinct purpose: searching for tenders, getting market snapshots, analyzing bidder fit, looking up CPV codes, explaining notice types, checking thresholds, and fetching details. There is no overlap that would cause an agent to misselect between them. The analyze_tender tool's dual input modes are intuitively separate from the other tools.

    Naming Consistency3/5

    Tool names mix patterns: most follow verb_noun (search_tenders, analyze_tender, look_up_cpv, look_up_notice_type), but market_snapshot_tool and eu_threshold use noun phrases, and tender_details is noun_noun. While readable, the inconsistent structure and the odd '_tool' suffix in market_snapshot_tool reduce predictability.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 7 tools, the server is well-scoped and covers the core needs of EU tender discovery, analysis, and reference lookups without bloat or redundancy. Each tool clearly earns its place.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool surface covers search, detail retrieval, market overview, cross-border analysis, CPV translation, notice type explanation, and threshold checks—covering the main workflows. Minor gaps exist, such as no ability to fetch attached tender documents or filter tenders by date range in search, but these are edge cases that agents can often work around.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources