Skip to main content
Glama
olisgeniuz

Neuroslop MCP

by olisgeniuz
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Hybrid

Related Servers

Alternatives to Neuroslop MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • signs-of-ai

      peopleworks
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Bilingual (EN/ES) AI-writing detection that shows the evidence instead of a percentage: named tells with line and column, hidden-character inspection, and citation cross-checking against a document's own bibliography. Seven of its nine tools run entirely locally and never touch the network.
      10
      28
      MIT

    • avoid-ai-writing-mcp

      conorbronsdon
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides local, deterministic scoring and detailed auditing of text for AI-writing patterns via two read-only tools, with no network calls or language models.
      2
      2 npm
      3
      MIT

    • stil-lint

      fredrsat
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables automated agents and writers to check Norwegian and English prose before sending, returning concrete style findings, revision hints, and verdicts instead of authorship claims, with a no-judgment band, positive quality checks, a private local mode, and phrase-bank memory.
      MIT

    • slop-cop

      0ju1c3
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Detects and fixes LLM prose patterns in text, exposing tools for auditing and improving writing quality in MCP-compatible hosts.
      11 npm
      2
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A4/5.0

    Scored across 3 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct operational mode: free local analysis (check), paid server-side rewriting (humanize), and local character normalization (clean). Check and humanize both concern style and could be momentarily confused, but the free/paid and analysis/rewrite distinction is spelled out clearly in the descriptions.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All three tools use the same namespace prefix plus a short snake_case verb (neuroslop_check, neuroslop_humanize, neuroslop_clean). No mixed conventions or ambiguous naming.

    Tool Count4/5

    Three tools map tightly to the server's narrow purpose of style analysis and text cleanup/rewriting, with no filler. It is on the lean side, but each tool covers a genuinely separate step of the workflow.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the core lifecycle: normalize input (clean), analyze style (check), and rewrite (humanize). Minor gaps exist around account/quota inspection and retrieving prior results, but agents can work around these.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources