generate-test-plan

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description should disclose behavioral traits, but it does not mention idempotency, side effects, or whether the tool modifies state. The hint about being 'Step 2' is not a clear behavioral disclosure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively concise but includes an imperative 'CALL THIS TOOL IMMEDIATELY' that adds noise. Could be more streamlined without the warning emoji and redundant phrasing.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given 0 parameters and no output schema, the description should clarify what the tool returns. It mentions both 'workflow instructions' and 'test scenarios' without specifying the output format or behavior, leaving ambiguity for a simple tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

There are 0 parameters, so schema coverage is 100%. However, the description mentions 'based on the analysis' implying implicit input, but no parameter is provided. Baseline 4 is reduced for missing context.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it generates a test plan with scenarios, but also includes an imperative to call immediately for full workflow instructions, causing ambiguity about the primary purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like generate-page-objects or reference tools. The 'CALL IMMEDIATELY' instruction is vague and does not explain prerequisites or post-conditions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.