generate-page-objects

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description must fully disclose behavior. It states it generates page objects but does not explain effects (e.g., file creation, prerequisites, return value). The additional instruction retrieval claim is vague.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but mixes an imperative call to action with a step description, reducing clarity. The warning emoji and 'IMMEDIATELY' are not essential. Could be more focused.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no annotations and no output schema, the description lacks details on prerequisites, side effects, or what the output looks like. For a simple tool with no parameters, more context about the workflow step is needed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0 parameters, schema coverage is 100%. The description does not need to add parameter details, and it does not, which is acceptable. Baseline for 0 parameters is 4.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates page objects with type-safe models and optimal selectors. However, the imperative 'CALL THIS TOOL IMMEDIATELY to get full workflow instructions' introduces ambiguity about the primary purpose, blending instruction retrieval with generation.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description simply says 'CALL THIS TOOL IMMEDIATELY' without context or conditions, and sibling tools are not referenced. A clear when-to-use/when-not-to-use is missing.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.