Skip to main content
Glama
ogasurfproject-jpg

hs-femtech-mcp

by ogasurfproject-jpg
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to hs-femtech-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Knoverge

      gynsus
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables humans and AI agents to share canonical, versioned knowledge through MCP, with auditable provenance, review workflows, and reconciliation.
      1
      Apache 2.0

    • universal-research-mcp

      mp-juns
      A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An append-only research operations framework and read-only MCP that tracks research plans, approvals, observations, claims, failures, revisions, and contributions with source-grounded evidence, providing search, evidence fetch, and audit capabilities without direct ledger writes.
      30
      64 PyPI
      MIT

    • geniusflow-federation

      Kaydeep0
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables evidence-backed research workflows over real-world entities, allowing users to inspect entity dossiers, re-fetch and verify source claims, admit or withhold attestations, and generate citation packets through remote MCP tools.
      -
    • teta-pi by teta-pi

      teta-piofficial

      teta-pi
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the TETA+PI verified entity registry, enabling AI agents to search, verify, and route intents to trusted entities.
      1
      -

    • acta-mcp

      VeritasActa
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables contributing, challenging, discovering, verifying, and querying contestable public records from AI coding tools via MCP.
      6
      49 npm
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct, but verify_source and check_source both deal with verification and could be confused. Others are clearly separate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Mostly verb-led snake_case, but how_to_verify breaks the pattern (it's a noun phrase). The rest follow verb_noun or verb_noun_noun consistently.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the typical range and appropriate for a registry/verification MCP covering registration, querying, and content explanations.

    Completeness4/5

    Core read and create functions are covered, but there is no update or delete mechanism for sources. However, this may be intentional for a public registry, making the gap minor.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources