Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to hs-femtech-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      An append-only research operations framework and read-only MCP that tracks research plans, approvals, observations, claims, failures, revisions, and contributions with source-grounded evidence, providing search, evidence fetch, and audit capabilities without direct ledger writes.
      30
      262 PyPI
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables evidence-backed research workflows over real-world entities, allowing users to inspect entity dossiers, re-fetch and verify source claims, admit or withhold attestations, and generate citation packets through remote MCP tools.
      -
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for the TETA+PI verified entity registry, enabling AI agents to search, verify, and route intents to trusted entities.
      1
      -
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Enables contributing, challenging, discovering, verifying, and querying contestable public records from AI coding tools via MCP.
      6
      28 npm
      1
      MIT
    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      MCP server for querying a cross-referenced directory of evidence-based therapies and interventions, enabling search by query, tier, problem, population, modality, and registry.
      1
      -

    TDQS

    A3.7/5.0

    Scored across 9 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are mostly distinct, but verify_source and check_source both deal with verification and could be confused. Others are clearly separate.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Mostly verb-led snake_case, but how_to_verify breaks the pattern (it's a noun phrase). The rest follow verb_noun or verb_noun_noun consistently.

    Tool Count5/5

    Nine tools is well within the typical range and appropriate for a registry/verification MCP covering registration, querying, and content explanations.

    Completeness4/5

    Core read and create functions are covered, but there is no update or delete mechanism for sources. However, this may be intentional for a public registry, making the gap minor.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues