groundcheck
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| ANTHROPIC_API_KEY | No | Optional fallback API key for LLM-judged tools if the client doesn't support MCP sampling. |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| groundcheck_evaluate_faithfulnessA | Score how well |
| groundcheck_detect_hallucinationsA | Find only the unsupported or contradicted claims in |
| groundcheck_evaluate_retrievalA | Score retrieval quality for |
| groundcheck_compareA | Judge which of two candidate answers to |
| groundcheck_run_suiteA | Run faithfulness (+ retrieval, where gold labels exist) over a batch of cases. |
| groundcheck_get_reportA | Fetch a previously persisted evaluation report by id. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| audit_rag_response | Walks through supplying an answer + sources and requests a full faithfulness audit. |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| list_reports_resource | All persisted report ids, as JSON. |
TDQS
Scored across 6 tools
The tools are mostly distinct, covering comparison, hallucination detection, faithfulness evaluation, retrieval evaluation, batch runs, and report retrieval. However, there is overlap between groundcheck_detect_hallucinations and groundcheck_evaluate_faithfulness as both deal with unsupported claims, though descriptions differentiate by use case.
All tools follow a consistent pattern: 'groundcheck_' prefix followed by an imperative verb and noun (e.g., compare, detect_hallucinations, evaluate_faithfulness, get_report). Snake_case and verb-noun structure are uniform across the set.
Six tools is well-scoped for a server focused on RAG evaluation. Each tool has a clear role without redundancy, and the count is appropriate for the domain.
The tools cover the main evaluation needs: comparing answers, detecting hallucinations, scoring faithfulness, evaluating retrieval, batch execution, and report retrieval. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated tool for answer relevance beyond the compare function, but the surface is largely complete.