A
licenseA
qualityC
maintenanceAn MCP server that exposes RAG retrieval evaluation as agent tools, allowing agents to retrieve passages and measure retrieval quality across multiple strategies.
3
MIT
groundcheck
by offquestxo
Related Servers
Alternatives to groundcheck
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceA local MCP server that packages LLM evaluation gates as reusable CI/CD primitives, enabling AI agents to run datasets against models, score responses, and enforce quality thresholds.10MIT
- AlicenseBqualityBmaintenanceAn MCP-style stdio server for evaluating AI agent outputs, enabling CI-friendly quality gates, regression comparisons, and canary promotion decisions.3MIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceMCP server that provides tools for evaluating LLM agent reliability, including adversarial task generation, automated LLM-as-judge assessment, and confidence statistics.31MIT
multivon-mcpofficial
AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceMCP server that gives AI coding agents direct access to evaluation tools.22Apache 2.0- AlicenseAqualityAmaintenanceMCP-native agent evaluation and observability server. Log traces, evaluate output quality with 12 built-in rules (PII detection, prompt injection, cost thresholds), and track agent costs. Real-time dashboard, OTel-compatible spans. Self-hosted, MIT licensed.91,3589MIT
TDQS
A4.5/5.0
Scored across 6 tools
Disambiguation4/5
The tools are mostly distinct, covering comparison, hallucination detection, faithfulness evaluation, retrieval evaluation, batch runs, and report retrieval. However, there is overlap between groundcheck_detect_hallucinations and groundcheck_evaluate_faithfulness as both deal with unsupported claims, though descriptions differentiate by use case.
Naming Consistency5/5
All tools follow a consistent pattern: 'groundcheck_' prefix followed by an imperative verb and noun (e.g., compare, detect_hallucinations, evaluate_faithfulness, get_report). Snake_case and verb-noun structure are uniform across the set.
Tool Count5/5
Six tools is well-scoped for a server focused on RAG evaluation. Each tool has a clear role without redundancy, and the count is appropriate for the domain.
Completeness4/5
The tools cover the main evaluation needs: comparing answers, detecting hallucinations, scoring faithfulness, evaluating retrieval, batch execution, and report retrieval. Minor gaps exist, such as no dedicated tool for answer relevance beyond the compare function, but the surface is largely complete.
Maintenance
ActivitySlowing
ResponsivenessNo issues