consult-mcp
Server Configuration
Describes the environment variables required to run the server.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| CONSULT_MCP_ALLOWED_BASE | No | Base path allowed for mutation operations in implement tool (guard) | |
| CONSULT_MCP_MAX_ACTIVE_DEBATES | No | Override the maximum number of active debates (default: 5) | 5 |
Instructions
Guidance the server publishes about itself, which clients place ahead of the tool catalog so the model reads it before choosing anything.
This server publishes no instructions, or was last inspected before Glama recorded them.
Capabilities
Features and capabilities supported by this server
Protocol revision2025-11-25
| Capability | Details |
|---|---|
| tools | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| prompts | {
"listChanged": false
} |
| resources | {
"subscribe": false,
"listChanged": false
} |
| experimental | {} |
Tools
Functions exposed to the LLM to take actions
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
| apilookupA | Look up current documentation for an API/library/SDK using web-capable CLI. Use cases:
Default agent is |
| challengeA | Push back on a claim — agent with skeptic persona finds counter-arguments. Use cases:
The persona is fixed to |
| codereviewA | Cross-agent code review. Pattern: 'Claude implemented → Codex and Gemini review the code'.
Sends file contents to N agents in parallel with reviewer persona.
Each agent's response is parsed into severity-tagged findings; raw text is
preserved in Use cases:
|
| consensusA | Multi-agent verdict with optional stance assignment + optional synthesis. Use cases:
Distinct from |
| consultB | Send a prompt to one CLI agent (claude/codex/gemini) and return its response. Use cases:
Available agents: claude, codex, gemini. Available personas: default, architect, reviewer, researcher, coder. |
| consult_parallelA | Fan-out the same prompt to multiple CLI agents in parallel. Use cases:
Wall time = max(per-agent latency), not sum. Duplicates are NOT deduplicated — each entry runs independently (intentional, supports variant generation). |
| councilA | 3-stage council: independent → cross-rank (anonymized) → synthesis. Use cases:
Returns a dict with |
| debate_cancelA | Request cancellation of a running debate. Returns immediately. If the debate is already finished (completed / cancelled / error), this is a
no-op and returns |
| debate_exportA | Render an archived/active debate as portable markdown or JSON.
|
| debate_listA | List debates, sorted by With |
| debate_statusB | Get current status of a debate (pending/running/completed/cancelled/error). |
| debate_replayC | Return full transcript for a debate (memory first, then archive). |
| debate_runA | Run an async round-robin debate to completion, streaming progress. Same arguments as Return shape (IT-008/C-01 taxonomy):
|
| debate_startA | Start an async round-robin debate. Returns The loop runs in the background; poll Use cases:
|
| diff_reviewA | Review a git diff for risks, regressions, and breaking changes. Pass either Use cases:
|
| implementA | Delegate implementation to a CLI agent that can edit files in Use cases:
Activates the agent's mutation flags (e.g.
If |
| plannerA | Decompose a problem into atomic tasks with optional dependencies. Use cases:
|
| delegate_implementationA | Plan → implement → review in one MCP call. The composite tool runs three stages sequentially:
Returns one of:
The tool never raises — all errors are surfaced as structured fields. |
Prompts
Interactive templates invoked by user choice
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No prompts | |
Resources
Contextual data attached and managed by the client
| Name | Description |
|---|---|
No resources | |
TDQS
Scored across 18 tools
Each tool targets a distinct workflow or function, from single-agent consult to multi-stage debate and code implementation. Descriptions clarify nuances between similar tools (e.g., consult_parallel vs. consensus vs. council), leaving no ambiguity.
All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., consult_parallel, debate_run, delegate_implementation). The convention is uniform and predictable across all 18 tools.
At 18 tools, the server is ambitious but well-scoped for its domain of multi-agent orchestration and code assistance. While extensive, each tool earns its place with specific use cases; the count does not feel excessive for the breadth of functionality.
The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of agent interactions: quick consult, parallel fan-out, structured consensus, multi-round debate with replay/export, planning, implementation, and code review. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose of MCP-based consulting.