Skip to main content
Glama
oblogin

consult-mcp

by oblogin
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Local

Related Servers

Alternatives to consult-mcp

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • personal-mcp

      buYoung
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      MCP server that bridges coding agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI) via ACP for pair programming, enabling agents to consult each other as tools.
      3
      -

    • frontier-orchestrator

      luckeyfaraday
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Multi-agent orchestration MCP server that lets Claude Code delegate backend, frontend, and tooling tasks to specialized AI agents (Codex, Kimi, Grok) with contract-first sequencing and workspace mutation guards.
      4
      7
      MIT

    • all-agents-mcp

      Dokkabei97
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      F
      maintenance
      Enables orchestrating multiple AI CLI agents (Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Copilot CLI) through a unified MCP interface for task delegation, cross-agent comparison, and specialized tools like code review and debugging.
      14
      7 npm
      14
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 18 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct workflow or function, from single-agent consult to multi-stage debate and code implementation. Descriptions clarify nuances between similar tools (e.g., consult_parallel vs. consensus vs. council), leaving no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent snake_case verb_noun pattern (e.g., consult_parallel, debate_run, delegate_implementation). The convention is uniform and predictable across all 18 tools.

    Tool Count4/5

    At 18 tools, the server is ambitious but well-scoped for its domain of multi-agent orchestration and code assistance. While extensive, each tool earns its place with specific use cases; the count does not feel excessive for the breadth of functionality.

    Completeness5/5

    The tool surface covers the full lifecycle of agent interactions: quick consult, parallel fan-out, structured consensus, multi-round debate with replay/export, planning, implementation, and code review. No obvious gaps exist for the stated purpose of MCP-based consulting.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources