edb_set_working_directory

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate idempotentHint=true and destructiveHint=false, so the description adds context about equivalence to EDB's action and file-loading benefits. It discloses behavioral traits without contradicting annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is two focused sentences plus structured Args/Returns sections. Every element earns its place, no redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple setter with annotations and a one-param schema, the description covers purpose, usage hint, param details, and return. It could mention state changes more explicitly but is largely complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Despite schema description coverage reported as 0%, the tool description manually explains the param ('directory: Working directory path') and return value ('str: Confirmation'), adding value beyond the schema structure.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description specifies a clear verb ('Set') and resource ('working directory for the debugger and debugged process'). It distinguishes from sibling tools like edb_set_environment_variable or edb_set_variable by focusing on directory path.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description states it is 'useful for programs that need to load files from a specific directory,' implying a use case but does not provide when-not-to-use or alternatives. It offers moderate guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.