edb_get_register

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description adds minimal behavioral information beyond annotations. Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true and destructiveHint=false, covering safety. Description only restates the action without additional insights like error handling or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is extremely concise with no unnecessary words. It starts with a clear purpose sentence, followed by structured Args and Returns sections. Every sentence adds value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple read-only tool with one parameter and an output schema, the description covers the basic functionality and return type. Missing error cases or edge behaviors, but adequate for typical use.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Description includes an Args section explaining the params parameter with example register names, adding some value. However, schema already describes the 'name' property similarly. With schema description coverage indicated as 0% (though schema shows a description), baseline is 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'Get' and resource 'value of a specific CPU register'. Distinguishes from siblings like edb_get_registers (plural) and edb_enum_registers (list) by emphasizing 'specific' and single register parameter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by purpose, but no explicit guidance on when to use this tool vs alternatives such as edb_get_registers or edb_enum_registers. No exclusions or context provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.