Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Linux MCP daemon

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Webmin system administration. 61 tools across 12 modules covering system monitoring, services, users, cron, packages, files, storage (SMART + LVM), security (Fail2ban), MySQL databases, Webmin ACL, and disk quotas. Four-tier safety framework with safe mode on by default. Python, MIT license, Docker and local deployment supported.
      61
      6
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Remote Linux operations via SSH, exposed as an MCP server, with tools for filesystem, systemd, Docker, network, and more, using per-user AD authentication and optional sudo elevation.
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Turns any Linux server into an AI-agent-accessible machine over HTTPS, allowing MCP clients like ChatGPT, Claude, and Grok to securely control files, run shell commands, inspect system state, query SQLite, and work with git behind a bearer token.
      1,323 npm
      4
      MIT

    TDQS

    A3.5/5.0

    Scored across 37 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Every tool pairs a clear resource category with a distinct operation; even similar tools like processes/list vs processes/top and disks/free vs disks/usage are explicitly differentiated. The category prefixes (files/, disks/, network/, etc.) make misselection unlikely.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    All tool names follow a consistent lowercase category/action slash pattern, which is highly predictable. However, many action segments are nouns rather than verbs (health, free, usage, filetype, logins, mounts, performance, partitions, os-release), so it is not a pure verb_noun convention.

    Tool Count3/5

    At 37 tools, the surface is heavy and beyond the usual 15–25 range, but the breadth of Linux administration domains covered justifies most entries. Each tool maps to a distinct sysadmin task, though the sheer number still makes the set feel large.

    Completeness3/5

    Core inspection and common operations are well covered across files, disks, network, processes, services, logs, and system info. However, the file surface lacks a delete operation and references a files/stat tool that does not exist, and there are no package install/remove or user management operations, leaving some obvious lifecycle gaps.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues