Skip to main content
Glama
nttcom

chakoshi MCP Server

Official
by nttcom

Related Servers

Alternatives to chakoshi MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Exposes verification and safety tools to MCP clients, enabling text and agent-output hallucination checks, computer-use action risk grading, and prompt-injection, jailbreak, harmful-content, sensitive-data, and fraud screening through an authenticated proxy.
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP clients a single decision-only tool to classify prompts as safe for local or cloud models, or as containing PII or jailbreak content, without executing actions or calling AI models.
      22 npm
      Cryptographic Autonomy 1.0 (Combined Work Exception)
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides a local, read-only MCP server that scans untrusted text for prompt-injection and returns an allow/review/block decision with evidence. It runs entirely on-device with no network requests and redacts sensitive strings by default.
      21 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for AI agent security guardrails. Provides input validation, prompt injection detection, PII redaction, output filtering, policy enforcement, rate limiting, and comprehensive audit logging.
      42 npm
      1
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Provides advisory AI-governance checks for MCP hosts and coding agents, enabling policy verdicts, PII masking, and audit traces before executing tool calls.
      3
      39 npm
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool cannot violate naming consistency; it is inherently consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is borderline for a moderation server; it may serve a narrow use case but feels thin for broader content safety needs.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only provides a single text moderation check, lacking other common operations like batch processing, severity levels, or content type differentiation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues