Skip to main content
Glama
nttcom

chakoshi MCP Server

Official
by nttcom
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to chakoshi MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • HallucC MCP Server

      fredyee
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Exposes verification and safety tools to MCP clients, enabling text and agent-output hallucination checks, computer-use action risk grading, and prompt-injection, jailbreak, harmful-content, sensitive-data, and fraud screening through an authenticated proxy.
      6
      4
      530 npm
      MIT

    • Prompt Compass MCP

      rishabhmpc
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides MCP clients a single decision-only tool to classify prompts as safe for local or cloud models, or as containing PII or jailbreak content, without executing actions or calling AI models.
      27 npm
      -

    • mcp-server-contentgate

      adsandcode
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Provides content guard checks as MCP tools, enabling an assistant to verify keyword coverage, translation drift, internal links, regulated claims, and sitemap lastmod while writing pages.
      6
      MIT

    • claimgate

      caseone115
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Enables MCP clients to gate drafts before publishing by extracting and checking claims against supplied evidence, enforcing configured policy rules, and flagging missing AI-disclosure requirements. It exposes tools for draft checks, claim listing, policy-only checks, and server metadata.
      5
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.2/5.0

    Scored across 1 tool

    Disambiguation5/5

    With only one tool, there is no possibility of confusion or overlapping purposes.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    A single tool cannot violate naming consistency; it is inherently consistent.

    Tool Count3/5

    One tool is borderline for a moderation server; it may serve a narrow use case but feels thin for broader content safety needs.

    Completeness2/5

    The server only provides a single text moderation check, lacking other common operations like batch processing, severity levels, or content type differentiation.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources