metaflow-mcp-server
Related Servers
Alternatives to metaflow-mcp-server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseCqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with MLflow experiments, runs, and registered models. Supports browsing experiments, retrieving run details with metrics and parameters, and querying the model registry through natural language.7MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables LLM agents to query Weights & Biases experiments, including listing projects, runs, metrics, plotting metrics, and retrieving run details.51MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables Claude to interact with ML experiment tracking, model registries, and deployment pipelines across popular MLOps platforms like MLflow.MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityBmaintenanceProvides AI agents with a toolset to query model inventories, trace dependencies, and analyze the impact of changes across machine learning models and data pipelines.14Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to interact with Dagster instances, explore data pipelines, monitor runs, and manage assets.924Apache 2.0
- AlicenseBqualityNot gradedmaintenanceEnables AI assistants to interact with Netflix Conductor Workflow Engine for troubleshooting workflows, managing executions, and creating/updating workflow and task definitions through natural language.192-
TDQS
Scored across 24 tools
Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose, from run management (get_run, run_flow, resume_run) to artifact handling (get_artifact, list_artifacts, search_artifacts) to comparisons (diff_runs, compare_cards). There is no ambiguity between similar-sounding tools like get_recent_runs and search_runs, as their descriptions clarify different scopes and filters.
All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern in snake_case (e.g., add_run_tags, get_config, list_flows). Even compound names like get_latest_failure or get_triggered_run_status adhere to the pattern. No mixing of conventions (camelCase or other styles) is present.
With 24 tools, the set is slightly above the typical well-scoped range (3-15) but remains justified for the Metaflow domain, which involves many distinct operations (runs, artifacts, cards, deployments, tags, etc.). The count is not excessive given the platform's complexity.
The tool surface covers most core workflows: running flows (locally and triggered), monitoring, fetching artifacts and logs, comparing runs, managing tags, and viewing cards and deployments. Minor gaps exist, such as no explicit tool to abort a locally run flow (only triggered runs) and no tool to delete runs or artifacts, but these do not severely hinder typical agent tasks.