Skip to main content
Glama

Related Servers

Alternatives to Dechonet MCP

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Comprehensive DNS security toolkit for AI agents: 103 tools across 13 categories including DNSSEC validation, subdomain takeover detection, email security audit, and more, all running locally with no external API calls required.
      100
      112 npm
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to perform passive security scans on domains, checking email spoofing (DMARC/SPF/DKIM), TLS weaknesses, security headers, exposed files, and subdomain-takeover risk without needing an API key.
      7
      77 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      Security intelligence API for AI models. CVE lookup with EPSS/KEV, domain recon (DNS, WHOIS, SSL, subdomains, WAF), and code security checks (secrets, injection, headers). 16 tools, no API key required.
      55
      33
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to run domain-intelligence investigations through six free tools: sanctions screening, IP geolocation with VPN/Tor detection, email validation with breach status, company profiling, WHOIS and email-security scoring, and a single-call domain dossier.
      2 npm
      MIT
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides AI agents with zero-cost, zero-dependency trust evaluation for domains, URLs, wallets, APIs, and IPs, returning a 0-100 score with SSL, DNS, WHOIS, security header, and content sub-scores, plus batch comparison to rank multiple targets.
      MIT

    TDQS

    A4.6/5.0

    Scored across 20 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Each tool has a distinct target layer (DNS, TLS, HTTP headers, email, IP/ASN, WHOIS, monitoring), and descriptions explicitly cross-reference alternatives to steer selection. However, several tools converge on graded postures (security_scan, owasp_check, impersonation_exposure, http_security/ssl_check all return A–F grades), so a few boundaries require reading the descriptions closely rather than being self-evident from the name.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    Every tool uses lowercase snake_case with a consistent noun-oriented, descriptive convention (dns_lookup, ssl_check, http_security, whois_lookup, subnet_calc). No camelCase, no mixed verb styles, and the pattern is predictable throughout.

    Tool Count4/5

    20 tools is on the heavier side, but the surface spans genuinely distinct domains (DNS, TLS, email auth, IP/BGP, WHOIS, subnet math, monitoring, aggregation), so most tools earn their place. The aggregate tools (security_scan, golive_check) plus their constituent single-purpose tools create some redundancy that pushes the count slightly above ideal.

    Completeness4/5

    Covers external reconnaissance comprehensively: subdomain discovery, DNS, propagation, TLS, headers, email auth and header analysis, ports, reverse DNS, ASN, WHOIS, plus monitoring and go-live checks. Minor gaps remain (no delete/stop-watch counterpart to watch_domain, limited tech-fingerprinting/CVE depth), but the core lifecycle for security recon is well covered.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues