get_task

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description must convey behavioral traits. It indicates a read operation (get) and describes the output, but does not explicitly state that it is non-destructive or mention any side effects, auth requirements, or error handling. This is adequate but minimal.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, concise sentence that conveys the essential information without any unnecessary words. It is front-loaded and efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given that this is a simple retrieval tool with one parameter and an output schema (implying return structure is documented), the description covers the key points: what it retrieves and by what key. It does not address edge cases like missing UUID or permissions, but for a straightforward get operation, it is largely sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema has 0% description coverage for the 'uuid' parameter. The tool description does not explain what a UUID is, how to obtain it, or any constraints (e.g., format). With low schema coverage, the description should compensate, but it does not add meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Get', the resource 'single task', the method 'by its UUID', and what is returned: 'full task details including tags'. This distinguishes it from sibling tools that list or search multiple tasks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies the need for a UUID and that this tool retrieves one specific task. While it does not explicitly exclude other use cases or mention alternatives, the purpose is clear enough for an AI to know when to select this tool over listing or search tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.