get_buyer
Retrieve a buyer's details using their unique ID. Quickly access buyer information for invoicing and management.
Instructions
Get a single buyer by ID
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Buyer ID |
Retrieve a buyer's details using their unique ID. Quickly access buyer information for invoicing and management.
Get a single buyer by ID
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| id | Yes | Buyer ID |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, and the description only states 'Get', implying a read operation. It does not disclose behavior on missing IDs, error handling, or any other behavioral traits that the agent should know.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise (6 words) and front-loaded with all essential information. Every word adds value with no redundancy.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple get-by-ID tool with one required parameter and no output schema, the description is nearly complete. It could optionally explain the return value structure, but it is adequate as is.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema fully documents the parameter. The description adds minimal value beyond restating the parameter ('by ID'). Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action ('Get'), the resource ('buyer'), and the criterion ('by ID'). It effectively distinguishes from sibling tools like 'list_buyers' which return multiple results.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. For example, it does not mention 'use list_buyers to get all buyers, use this to get a specific one', leaving the AI without decision support.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nikhilb2/simple_invoicing-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server