create_product
Create a product in the invoicing system by submitting product data matching the API schema.
Instructions
Create a new product
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | Yes | Product data object matching the API schema |
Create a product in the invoicing system by submitting product data matching the API schema.
Create a new product
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| data | Yes | Product data object matching the API schema |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
The description only repeats the title with no additional behavioral context. No annotations are provided, so the description must carry the full burden, but it fails to disclose any traits such as idempotency, auth requirements, or side effects.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is very short (one sentence) but lacks substance. It is under-specified and does not provide valuable information beyond the tool name, making it insufficient rather than concise.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Given the lack of output schema and nested object parameter, the description is incomplete. It does not explain the return value, required fields, or when creation fails, which an agent would need to use the tool correctly.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 100% with one parameter described as 'Product data object matching the API schema'. The tool description does not add any further meaning beyond the schema, so baseline 3 is appropriate.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states 'Create a new product', which is specific verb+resource. However, it does not differentiate from sibling tools like create_invoice or create_payment, all of which have similar 'Create a new...' descriptions.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No usage guidelines are provided. The description does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives, nor any prerequisites or context.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nikhilb2/simple_invoicing-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server