Skip to main content
Glama
nik-kale

pangram-editorial

by nik-kale
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
JavaScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to pangram-editorial

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • content-qa-mcp

      Alvi-808
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables editorial content QA over the Model Context Protocol with four local tools that analyze readability, AI-sounding language, SEO on-page factors, and produce full reports where every finding includes an actionable fix.
      4
      1
      MIT

    • avoid-ai-writing-mcp

      conorbronsdon
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Provides local, deterministic scoring and detailed auditing of text for AI-writing patterns via two read-only tools, with no network calls or language models.
      4
      2
      8 npm
      2
      MIT

    • PureRank MCP Server

      vadimsv1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables AI agents to score drafts for AI-content-spam risk before publishing and scan entire sites, providing a pre-publish QA gate with pass/warn/fail verdicts.
      8 npm
      MIT

    • clearon-source-audit

      kwgoodwin
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables revision-bound source audits with exact article fingerprinting, claim-to-source mapping, quotation verification, and immutable JSON evidence reports for prepublication review.
      9
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    One endpoint for every MCP toolRayrun runs every MCP server behind one URL and holds the credentials. Each call is decided per client, tool, and argument, then recorded.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    A3.8/5.0

    Scored across 2 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Both tools analyze AI attribution but serve different purposes: one provides a comprehensive audit with segment-level breakdowns, the other gives a quick summary. Their descriptions clearly distinguish them, so no ambiguity.

    Naming Consistency4/5

    Both tools use the 'pangram_' prefix and snake_case, but one uses 'attribution_audit' (noun_noun) and the other 'quick_snapshot' (adjective_noun). This is a minor inconsistency; otherwise, naming is predictable.

    Tool Count3/5

    The server has only 2 tools, which feels thin for a domain that could benefit from additional tools like batch analysis or report generation. However, the two levels of detail (quick and comprehensive) are well-scoped for its purpose.

    Completeness4/5

    For the narrow domain of AI attribution analysis, the tools cover quick and detailed analysis. There are no obvious missing operations, as it's a pure analysis service. Minor gap: no batch or comparison feature.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources