pangram-editorial
Click on "Deploy Server".
Wait a few minutes for the server to deploy. Once ready, it will show a "Started" state.
In the chat, type
@followed by the MCP server name and your instructions, e.g., "@pangram-editorial Run an attribution audit on this article"
That's it! The server will respond to your query, and you can continue using it as needed.
Here is a step-by-step guide with screenshots.
Pangram MCP Editorial Tools
An MCP (Model Context Protocol) server that integrates Pangram's AI attribution APIs into professional writing workflows.
Designed for editorial review, transparency, and quality assurance when AI-assisted tools are used in journalism, research, and enterprise content creation.
Use Cases
Newsrooms & Publishers — Audit AI attribution before publication
Academic Writers — Verify transparency requirements for submissions
Enterprise Content Teams — QA workflows for AI-assisted documentation
Legal & Compliance — Attribution audits for authored materials
Related MCP server: PureRank MCP Server
Features
Tool | Purpose |
| Detailed attribution and segment analysis for transparency audits |
| Quick attribution snapshot for editorial review |
Quick Start
1. Install
git clone https://github.com/nicholasgriffintn/pangram-mcp-editorial-tools.git
cd pangram-mcp-editorial-tools
npm install
npm run build2. Get Your Pangram API Key
Go to pangram.com
Log in to your dashboard
Click API in the header
Copy your API key
3. Configure Claude Desktop
Add to your Claude Desktop config (~/Library/Application Support/Claude/claude_desktop_config.json on macOS):
{
"mcpServers": {
"pangram-editorial": {
"command": "node",
"args": ["/absolute/path/to/pangram-mcp-editorial-tools/dist/index.js"],
"env": {
"PANGRAM_API_KEY": "your-api-key-here"
}
}
}
}4. Restart Claude Desktop
The Pangram editorial tools will now be available in all your conversations.
Usage Examples
Once connected, use naturally in Claude:
"Run an attribution audit on this article before I submit it"
"Quick transparency check on this draft"
"Analyze the authorship segments in my report"
Tools Reference
pangram_attribution_audit
Comprehensive attribution analysis providing:
Overall authorship assessment
Segment-by-segment attribution breakdown
Confidence metrics per section
Transparency report suitable for editorial review
Parameters:
text(required): Content to analyze (minimum 50 words)response_format(optional):"markdown"(default) or"json"
pangram_quick_snapshot
Fast attribution check for iterative editorial workflows:
Summary authorship indicator
Attribution percentage
Quick review status
Parameters:
text(required): Content to analyze (minimum 50 words)
Requirements
Node.js 18+
Pangram API key (pangram.com)
Claude Desktop or any MCP-compatible client
API Note
Pangram's API is priced separately from their web dashboard subscription. See pangram.com/solutions/api for details.
Development
npm install
npm run build
npm run dev # watch modeAbout
This project addresses the growing need for attribution transparency in professional writing workflows. As AI-assisted authorship becomes standard practice in journalism, research, and enterprise content, tools that provide clear attribution analysis support responsible disclosure and editorial integrity.
License
MIT
Contributing
Contributions welcome. Please ensure any additions maintain the project's focus on editorial transparency and professional quality assurance.
Available Tools
2 toolspangram_attribution_auditAttribution AuditBRead-onlyIdempotent
Analyze text for AI attribution using Pangram's attribution analysis API.
This tool provides transparency analysis for AI-assisted content, supporting editorial review and quality assurance workflows. It identifies authorship patterns and provides segment-level attribution breakdowns.
Analysis includes:
Overall authorship assessment
Average and maximum AI attribution scores
Breakdown of authorship patterns by segment
Segment-by-segment attribution analysis with confidence levels
Args:
text (string): The content to analyze. Must be at least 50 words for accurate analysis.
response_format ('markdown' | 'json'): Output format (default: 'markdown')
Returns:
Markdown: Formatted transparency report with authorship assessment and segment analysis
JSON: Structured data with all attribution metrics
Use cases:
Editorial review before publication
Transparency audits for AI-assisted content
Quality assurance for professional writing workflows
Attribution documentation for compliance requirements
Requires: PANGRAM_API_KEY environment variable to be set
Inputs: text (required), response_format.
pangram_quick_snapshotQuick Attribution SnapshotARead-onlyIdempotent
Get a quick attribution snapshot for editorial review.
Returns essential metrics for fast iteration during the writing and editing process. Use this for rapid checks when detailed segment analysis isn't needed.
Args:
text (string): The content to analyze. Must be at least 50 words.
Returns: A brief summary with:
Authorship indicator
Attribution percentage
Review status
Example: "Quick snapshot for this paragraph" → "✅ PRIMARY AUTHOR - 12.3% AI attribution"
Inputs: text (required).
Tool Schema Changelog
Recent tool additions, removals, and schema changes observed during successful MCP inspections.
Loading tool schema changelog…
TDQS
Scored across 2 tools
Both tools analyze AI attribution but serve different purposes: one provides a comprehensive audit with segment-level breakdowns, the other gives a quick summary. Their descriptions clearly distinguish them, so no ambiguity.
Both tools use the 'pangram_' prefix and snake_case, but one uses 'attribution_audit' (noun_noun) and the other 'quick_snapshot' (adjective_noun). This is a minor inconsistency; otherwise, naming is predictable.
The server has only 2 tools, which feels thin for a domain that could benefit from additional tools like batch analysis or report generation. However, the two levels of detail (quick and comprehensive) are well-scoped for its purpose.
For the narrow domain of AI attribution analysis, the tools cover quick and detailed analysis. There are no obvious missing operations, as it's a pure analysis service. Minor gap: no batch or comparison feature.
Maintenance
Related MCP Connectors
Fact-checks generated content against your sources of truth showing what to trust, change, & verify.
Check AI-written drafts against your source documents, with the passage behind every verdict.
Audits how AI answer engines read a page and grades it A+ to F across four measured layers.
Find AI-isms with evidence and fingerprint a writing voice from samples. 3 of 5 free.
Related MCP Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI content detection with sentence-level and paragraph-level AI probability scoring to identify and fix AI-generated text.45 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceEnables AI agents to score drafts for AI-content-spam risk before publishing and scan entire sites, providing a pre-publish QA gate with pass/warn/fail verdicts.14 npmMIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceProvides AI content watermarking and C2PA compliance for EU AI Act Article 50, enabling detection, verification, and batch processing of authenticated content.10 npm25 PyPIMIT
- AlicenseAqualityCmaintenanceEnables editorial content QA over the Model Context Protocol with four local tools that analyze readability, AI-sounding language, SEO on-page factors, and produce full reports where every finding includes an actionable fix.41MIT