Set Light Brightness
set_light_brightnessSet the light brightness on the Dr. Dabber Switch 2 vaporizer to any level from 0 to 100.
Instructions
Set light brightness from 0 to 100.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| brightness | Yes |
set_light_brightnessSet the light brightness on the Dr. Dabber Switch 2 vaporizer to any level from 0 to 100.
Set light brightness from 0 to 100.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| brightness | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description must disclose behavioral traits, but it only repeats the schema range. It omits crucial details like whether the light turns on, side effects, or required permissions.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single concise sentence that immediately conveys the core purpose. However, it could be slightly improved by adding contextual information without becoming verbose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple setter tool with no output schema, the description provides only the bare minimum. It lacks information about return values, failure modes, or interaction with the device state, making it incomplete for an agent to use confidently.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, so the description should compensate, but it only restates the numeric range already in the schema. It does not clarify what 'brightness' means (e.g., percentage, lumens) or how it interacts with the light state.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (set), the resource (light brightness), and the allowed range (0 to 100), making the purpose unmistakable and distinguishing it from sibling tools like set_light_mode.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., set_light_mode, set_active_preset), nor any context about prerequisites or expected outcomes.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nidamen/drdabber-switch2-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server