Get Switch 2 Presets

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that data is 'cached', implying potential staleness, which is useful. No annotations exist, so description carries full burden; however, it omits details like typical latency, data format, or whether this requires an active connection.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single, front-loaded sentence with zero waste. Efficiently communicates core functionality.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lists specific return categories (cached preset temperatures, hold times, heating profiles, custom points), which is adequate for a simple read tool with no output schema. Could mention data format or update frequency, but completeness is largely satisfied.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

No parameters in schema; schema_coverage is 100%. Baseline score with no parameters is 4, and description adds no extra param info, but none is needed.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Return' and clearly identifies the resource as 'cached preset temperatures, hold times, heating profiles, and custom points', making purpose unambiguous and distinct from sibling setter tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., get_status or get_device_info for other data). No context on prerequisites or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.