Skip to main content
Glama
nickgeorgeseo

mcp-gatehouse

by nickgeorgeseo
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
Python

Related Servers

Alternatives to mcp-gatehouse

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Agentrim MCP

      almohtadyg1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A least-privilege enforcement proxy for MCP servers. It sits between MCP clients and upstream servers, enforcing tool policies, hiding denied tools, requiring human approval for risky actions, and providing a structured audit trail.
      MIT

    • mcp-data-gateway

      willdynan
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enforces identity-based access control and audit logging for MCP servers, letting you grant fine-grained tool permissions to users and systems while failing secure by default.
      MIT

    • relay-mcp

      yujoonko1
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      Enables developers to expose any dev tool as a safe, audited MCP server with permission tiers, audit logging, and automatic argument validation.
      MIT

    • whatbox-mcp

      SNSEIxAUGMNTD
      A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      A security-first MCP server for managing Whatbox slots with structured read-only inspection and approval-gated mutations, including storage, services, website deployment, and torrent control.
      30
      MIT

    • mcpnew

      stealth-alpha
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Enables developers to scaffold secure-by-default MCP servers with deny-all permissions, typed tool stubs, and pre-wired audit hooks, while enforcing security posture through CI.
      0
      MIT

    • TheeDiscordMCP

      TheETR
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      Local MCP server for inspecting and managing an allowlisted Discord server via Discord's REST API, with safety modes, idempotent JSON blueprints, and destructive-operation safeguards.
      27
      1
      MIT
    Deploy Server
    Shareable, User-Owned Context BackendPeople, applications, and agents read, write, and coordinate together in one context lake. Reach it over MCP, a CLI, a Python SDK, or REST.fulcradynamics.comAd

    TDQS

    A4.4/5.0

    Scored across 4 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool targets a distinct action and the descriptions explicitly cross-reference each other (add_note vs cancel_order, list_orders vs lookup_order). There is no realistic way to misselect among these four.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All four names follow a clean verb_noun snake_case pattern: add_note, cancel_order, list_orders, lookup_order. The verbs (add/cancel/list/lookup) are distinct and predictable.

    Tool Count4/5

    Four tools is a bit lean but well-matched to a gatehouse control surface (observe, annotate, cancel). Each tool earns its place with no redundant or filler operations.

    Completeness4/5

    The surface covers the read (list_orders, lookup_order) and controlled-write (add_note, cancel_order) lifecycle cleanly. Order creation and non-cancellation status updates are absent, but these are plausibly out of scope for a gatehouse desk.

    Maintenance

    ActivityMaintained
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources