mcp-gatehouse
This server for order management demonstrates permission tiers, approval gates, and audit logging.
Look up orders (
lookup_order): Read-only status check with no side effects.Add notes (
add_note): Write operation to attach a note; the optionalapi_keyargument is redacted in logs and approval requests.Cancel orders (
cancel_order): Destructive operation requiring explicit human approval; fails closed if no approver is configured, with all attempts recorded.
Key features:
Tools are assigned access tiers (
READ,WRITE,DESTRUCTIVE) for fine-grained control.DESTRUCTIVE(and optionallyWRITE) operations go through approval gates, denying if approval is missing.Every call—approved, denied, or failed—is logged in a JSONL audit trail with timestamps, redacted arguments, and outcomes.
Sensitive arguments like
api_keyare automatically masked before logging or reaching an approver.
mcp-gatehouse
Permission tiers, approval gates, and audit logging for MCP servers. The server is the gatekeeper: you decide what an AI can read, what it can write, and what's off-limits — and every action gets logged.
Most MCP servers hand the model every tool at full strength and keep no
record of what it did. That's fine for a demo. It's not fine the day an
agent has write access to your CRM, your books, or your order system.
mcp-gatehouse is the missing gate, enforced inside the server — no
proxy, no external policy service, no dependencies beyond the official
mcp SDK.
pip install mcp-gatehouseWhat you get
Permission tiers | Every tool is declared |
Approval gates | Tiers you choose require a sign-off before the tool runs. Your approver is any callable — a terminal prompt, a Slack ping, a ticket. Fails closed: a gated tool with no approver configured is denied, not waved through. |
Audit log | Append-only JSONL, one line per call — allowed, denied, or failed — with UTC timestamps and durations. The answer to "what did the AI actually do?" six months later. |
Redaction | Argument keys you name ( |
Denylist | Block a tool outright, whatever its tier. |
Related MCP server: mcp-trust-guard
Quickstart
from mcp.server.fastmcp import FastMCP
from mcp_gatehouse import AccessTier, AuditLog, Gatehouse, Policy
mcp = FastMCP("order-desk")
gatehouse = Gatehouse(
mcp,
policy=Policy(approver=lambda req: input(f"allow {req.tool}? [y/N] ") == "y"),
audit=AuditLog(path="audit.jsonl"),
)
@gatehouse.tool(tier=AccessTier.READ)
def lookup_order(order_id: str) -> str:
"""Look up an order's status."""
...
@gatehouse.tool(tier=AccessTier.DESTRUCTIVE)
def cancel_order(order_id: str) -> str:
"""Cancel an order. Runs only if the approver says yes."""
...
mcp.run()That's the whole integration: build your FastMCP server exactly as the
SDK docs show, but register tools through the gatehouse. Schema generation,
transports, and everything else work unchanged — the guard preserves the
function's signature.
Under the default policy, DESTRUCTIVE requires approval and everything
is audited. Gate writes too with one line:
Policy(require_approval=frozenset({AccessTier.WRITE, AccessTier.DESTRUCTIVE}), ...)What the audit trail looks like:
{"ts": "2026-07-16T14:02:11+00:00", "tool": "lookup_order", "tier": "read", "outcome": "ok", "arguments": {"order_id": "4417"}, "duration_ms": 0.42}
{"ts": "2026-07-16T14:02:38+00:00", "tool": "add_note", "tier": "write", "outcome": "ok", "arguments": {"order_id": "4417", "note": "call back", "api_key": "«redacted»"}, "duration_ms": 1.08}
{"ts": "2026-07-16T14:03:05+00:00", "tool": "cancel_order", "tier": "destructive", "outcome": "denied", "reason": "approver refused", "arguments": {"order_id": "4417"}}Try the demo
The package ships a runnable order-desk server with all three tiers wired up and a terminal-prompt approver:
mcp-gatehouse-demoPoint any MCP client at it over stdio (Claude Desktop, etc.), ask the model
to cancel an order, and watch the approval land in your terminal — and the
verdict land in audit.jsonl either way. examples/orders_server.py is
the same server as a copyable template.
Design notes
Enforcement lives inside the server, at the tool boundary. A proxy can't see your tools' semantics, and a policy service is one more thing to deploy. A 40-person plant doesn't have a platform team; this is a few small classes and a JSONL file.
Fail closed. Security defaults that quietly allow are worse than none. That includes redaction: argument values the scrubber can't take apart (arbitrary objects, bytes) are replaced with an opaque placeholder rather than passed through, and exception messages stay out of the log — only the exception type is recorded, because error text loves to embed the very values you just redacted.
The audit log records denials and errors, not just successes — the calls that didn't happen are half the story.
A blocking terminal approver and the stdio transport don't mix — stdout/stdin are the protocol pipe. The demo's approver prompts on
/dev/ttyfor exactly that reason (and denies when no terminal exists). Real deployments should approve out-of-band: Slack, a ticket, a queue.What this is not: authentication, transport encryption, or a sandbox. It's a gate inside your server, not a perimeter around it. See SECURITY.md.
Compatibility
Targets the official mcp Python SDK
v1.x (mcp>=1.27,<2) and Python 3.10+. When SDK v2 ships for the
2026-07-28 spec revision, a v2-compatible release will follow — the
public API here (Gatehouse, Policy, AuditLog, AccessTier) will
not change.
Who built this
Nick George — I design and run MCP servers in production for a mid-market reverse logistics-tech company, and build them for businesses at nickgeorgeai.com. This library is the permission-and-audit discipline from those builds, extracted.
If you're an owner or operator wondering what MCP even is, start with the plain-English guide: What is an MCP server?
License
Maintenance
Tools
Related MCP Servers
- Alicense-qualityBmaintenanceSecurity gateway for MCP servers. Wraps any MCP server with per-tool policies (Cedar + JSON), Ed25519-signed decision receipts, human approval gates, and trust tiers. Shadow mode by default — logs everything, blocks nothing.4849MIT
- Alicense-qualityFmaintenanceSecurity middleware for MCP servers. Trust-based access control, rate limiting, and audit logging. Zero dependencies.16MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceEnables Discord server moderation actions including kick, ban, timeout, role management, channel operations, audit logs, and member management through MCP tools.296MIT
- Alicense-qualityBmaintenanceA least-privilege enforcement proxy for MCP servers. It sits between MCP clients and upstream servers, enforcing tool policies, hiding denied tools, requiring human approval for risky actions, and providing a structured audit trail.MIT
Related MCP Connectors
A MCP server built for developers enabling Git based project management with project and personal…
Independent A-F trust grade for any MCP server, watched for drift. Free, never for sale.
An MCP server for deep research or task groups
Latest Blog Posts
- Who's Calling? MCP Hosts Are an Identity Blind Spot (And the Spec Knows It)By Om-Shree-0709 on .mcpAgent IdentityOAuth 2.1
- Your AI Chatbot Just Exposed Your CEO's Salary to an InternBy Om-Shree-0709 on .Agent IdentityMCP SecurityOAuth Delegation
- Why MCP Servers Need Execution Sandboxing (And Why Your Current Stack Isn't Enough)By Om-Shree-0709 on .Agentic AiPrompt InjectionWebAssembly
MCP directory API
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nickgeorgeseo/mcp-gatehouse'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server