nexus-exchange-mcp
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to nexus-exchange-mcp
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides cryptocurrency project data to AI agents11MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI agents to scan the market, manage positions, and retrieve trading metrics for Bybit through natural language commands.1AGPL 3.0
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents direct access to Polymarket Crypto prediction markets, enriched with live spot prices. Discover markets, analyze order books, paper trade strategies, track activity, and execute live trades — all through natural language.1AGPL 3.0
- FlicenseBqualityFmaintenanceAn MCP server that enables AI models like Claude to interact with the Trading Simulator API for checking balances, viewing prices, and executing trades with automatic chain detection.15-
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAn MCP server that provides DeFi data tools (crypto prices, whale concentration, funding rates) for AI agents via the x402 protocol.8 npm1MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityCmaintenanceAn MCP server that gives AI agents the ability to check crypto wallet balances, track token prices, calculate portfolio value, monitor gas prices, and track the Fear & Greed Index — all with zero external dependencies using free public APIs.MIT
TDQS
Scored across 115 tools
Roughly half the surface consists of deprecated aliases that duplicate a live tool one-to-one (get_balance/fetch_balance, get_orderbook/fetch_order_book, place_order/create_order, amend_order/edit_order, list_deposits/fetch_deposits, etc.), so an agent must constantly resolve 'which of these two identical tools do I call?'. On top of that, several tools are admitted dead ends that always fail (create_bridge_deposit_address, list_bridge_deposit_addresses, get_deposit_target), and get_deposit vs create_deposit vs deposit_collateral add further near-miss overlap.
Two competing conventions coexist: the modern set uses fetch_*/create_*/edit_*/cancel_*/register_* while the deprecated set uses get_*/list_*/place_*/amend_*/adjust_*. Within each family the verb_noun pattern is readable, but mixing get_/fetch_ and place_/create_ across the same resource is exactly the inconsistency the rubric penalizes.
115 tools is an extreme mismatch for any single server. Even after removing the ~45 deprecated aliases, the live surface is 60+ tools, which far exceeds a well-scoped set and forces the agent to carry a large mental model of near-duplicates.
Domain coverage is actually broad and strong: markets/tickers/orderbook/OHLCV/funding, full order lifecycle (create, batch, preview, edit, cancel, cancel-all), account/positions/PnL/fees/history, deposits/withdrawals/bridge, API keys, agent keys, wallets, and WS tokens. The main gap is that a few advertised bridge/deposit-target tools have no working server implementation, leaving genuine dead ends.