run_gartner_products_search

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full behavioral burden. It usefully discloses '1 point per returned record' as a cost signal, but does not mention pagination behavior, rate limits, permissions, or the full result shape.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Two compact sentences, front-loaded with purpose and cost, with no redundant or filler content.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a low-complexity two-parameter search tool with no output schema, the description plus schema covers inputs, keyword scope, and cost. Missing pagination/rate-limit details are minor, though behavioral transparency remains somewhat thin.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents query and max_items. The description adds only that the query is a keyword and mentions result fields, without adding search syntax or filtering semantics beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

States a specific verb (search) and resource (Gartner Peer Insights products) scoped by keyword, and names the result fields. It is clearly distinguishable from siblings in practice, though it does not explicitly contrast with run_gartner_product or run_gartner_market_products.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Usage is implied by 'Search ... by keyword,' but the description gives no explicit when-to-use/when-not guidance and does not name alternatives such as run_gartner_product for a single product lookup.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.