NeuralVerge MCP Server
OfficialRelated Servers
Alternatives to NeuralVerge MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceEnables AI agents to access a unified catalog of tools from various APIs (OpenAPI, GraphQL, MCP, Google Discovery) through the MCP protocol.6 npmMIT

Mixpeek MCP Serverofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceAutomatically loads Mixpeek's OpenAPI spec and exposes its endpoints as MCP tools, enabling natural language interaction with Mixpeek's API via standard MCP clients.23 npm1MIT- AlicenseNot gradedqualityNot gradedmaintenanceExposes over 19,000 Apify Actors as MCP tools for web scraping, data extraction, and OSINT automation. It enables AI agents to dynamically discover and execute scrapers to collect structured data and crawl web content.MIT
- AlicenseAqualityBmaintenanceEnables AI agents and MCP clients to retrieve company profiles, hiring signals, YC companies, Wikidata enrichment, email validation, OpenStreetMap places, market quotes, and remote jobs via eight tools backed by the user's own Apify account.8MIT
- FlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceExposes any REST API as MCP tools, enabling AI agents to discover and call existing HTTP endpoints without modifying the original API.-

FullEnrich MCPofficial
AlicenseNot gradedqualityAmaintenanceEnables AI agents to search B2B people and companies, enrich contacts with verified emails and mobile phone numbers via waterfall enrichment across 25+ providers, and export results as CSV or JSON. Supports prospecting, org mapping, candidate sourcing, and outreach workflows through OAuth-authenticated remote access from any MCP-compatible client.8MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Multiple tools target similar actions (email finder vs LinkedIn email, people vs company employee search, phone vs US phone enrichment), and async workflows (research vs agent) are easy to confuse. Descriptions help clarify, but boundaries between tools are not always sharp.
Strong run_ prefix creates a consistent feel, but suffixes mix verb-style (search, extract) and noun-style (email_finder, phone_enrichment_us) naming. The outlier get_session_status breaks the run_ pattern, and run_linkedin_domain is misleading (it does not search by domain).
With 16 tools, this is slightly above the typical 3-15 range, but the server covers distinct domains (research, search, LinkedIn, email, phone, Crunchbase), so each tool earns a place. The count feels justified for a comprehensive enrichment platform, though it borders on heavy.
Core data retrieval surfaces are well covered: research workflow, search, extraction, LinkedIn, email, phone, and company data. Notable gaps include no agent management (list/create agents) and no session control (cancel/pause), but most practical workflows are supported.