Skip to main content
Glama
neev-25

Smart Expense Management MCP

by neev-25

record_balance

Record a money exchange with a friend: specify who paid, and track the resulting debt.

Instructions

Record a money exchange with a friend.

direction options: "i_paid" → I paid for them → they owe me ₹amount "they_paid" → They paid for me → I owe them ₹amount

Examples:

  • "Rahul owes me ₹500 for recharge" → direction='i_paid', friend_id=Rahul's id

  • "I paid ₹120 for Prince for chai" → direction='i_paid', friend_id=Prince's id

  • "Jay paid ₹200 for my food at Domino's" → direction='they_paid', friend_id=Jay's id

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
amountYes
reasonNo
directionYes
friend_idYes
expense_idNo

Output Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault

No arguments

Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It explains direction semantics and gives examples but does not disclose side effects, idempotency, or authorization requirements.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness5/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with bullet points for direction and clear examples. Every sentence serves a purpose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the core use case but lacks details on error handling, prerequisites (e.g., friend must exist), and return value. Output schema exists but description does not reference it.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters2/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 0% so description must explain all parameters. It only explains 'direction' with options; other parameters (amount, reason, friend_id, expense_id) are not described beyond examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool records a money exchange with a friend and explains the two direction options. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_expense which are for group expenses.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides explicit direction options and examples for when to use each. It lacks explicit when-not-to-use guidance but clearly covers primary use cases.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/neev-25/expense-manager-mcp'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server