kill
Kill the target process of a Frida session by providing the session ID. Use this to terminate a process during dynamic analysis.
Instructions
Kill the target process of a session.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Kill the target process of a Frida session by providing the session ID. Use this to terminate a process during dynamic analysis.
Kill the target process of a session.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| session_id | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
With no annotations, the description carries full burden for behavioral disclosure. It only states the action but does not reveal consequences (e.g., whether permissions are required, if the process is immediately terminated, or side effects).
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is a single, concise sentence, but it omits essential information. Conciseness is not beneficial when it comes at the cost of completeness.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a simple tool with one parameter and no output schema, the description should at least explain the parameter and expected behavior. It fails to provide context for successful invocation or error handling.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema coverage is 0%, yet the description does not explain the only parameter (session_id). The agent has no context on what value to provide or its format, relying solely on the schema title which is minimal.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the action (kill) and the resource (target process of a session). It is specific and distinguishes from siblings like list_processes or resume_session.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Does not mention prerequisites, such as needing an active session or process, nor when to use other tools like resume or detach.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/neeetman/frida-mcp'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server