detach

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description mentions the key behavioral trait 'process keeps running', but with no annotations provided, it fails to disclose other important details such as whether the session is invalidated, resources freed, or any side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single concise sentence, but it is front-loaded with the primary purpose. It is appropriately sized, though a bit more structure could improve readability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the low complexity (1 param, no output schema, no annotations), the description is incomplete. It lacks context about the session_id parameter and does not explain the effects of detaching (e.g., can it be reattached?).

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 0% description coverage for the sole parameter 'session_id', and the tool description adds no meaning about the parameter's format, constraints, or how to determine its value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (Detach Frida from a session) and explicitly notes that the process keeps running, which distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'kill' that would terminate the process.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It implies detaching without killing, but does not specify prerequisites, when not to use, or compare with siblings like 'kill' or 'resume_session'.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.