Skip to main content
Glama
nebula-contrib

NebulaGraph MCP Server

Related Servers

Alternatives to NebulaGraph MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • A
      license
      C
      quality
      Not graded
      maintenance
      A lightweight server implementation of the Model Context Protocol that connects Memgraph database with LLMs, allowing users to interact with graph databases through natural language.
      1
      25
      MIT
    • F
      license
      A
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables running Cypher queries and retrieving schema from Neo4j databases, supporting AI-driven graph exploration and text-to-Cypher workflows.
      3
      -
    • A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that enables LLMs to interact with GraphQL APIs by providing schema introspection and query execution capabilities.
      1,301 npm
      3
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      B
      maintenance
      MCP server for Neo4j that provides abstract graph operations for LLMs, enabling safe and consistent interaction with Neo4j databases through tools like search, insert, update, delete, and schema introspection.
      8
      MIT
    • A
      license
      A
      quality
      A
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server implementation that enables AI assistants to securely interact with GreptimeDB, allowing them to explore database schema, read data, and execute SQL queries through a controlled interface.
      15
      29
      MIT

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 5 tools

    Disambiguation5/5

    Each tool has a clearly distinct purpose with no overlap: execute_query for general queries, find_neighbors for vertex adjacency, find_path for pathfinding, get_space_schema for schema inspection, and list_spaces for space enumeration. The descriptions reinforce these distinct functions, making tool selection unambiguous.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tool names follow a consistent verb_noun pattern (e.g., execute_query, find_neighbors, list_spaces) with clear, descriptive verbs. There are no deviations in style or convention, making the naming predictable and easy to understand across the set.

    Tool Count5/5

    With 5 tools, this server is well-scoped for graph database operations, covering essential functions like querying, traversal, pathfinding, and schema management. Each tool earns its place without feeling excessive or insufficient for the domain.

    Completeness4/5

    The tool set provides strong coverage for core graph operations, including query execution, neighbor and path finding, and space/schema inspection. A minor gap exists in CRUD operations for vertices or edges (e.g., create, update, delete), but agents can likely work around this with queries.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues