delete_item
Remove a specified Zotero item from the library using its unique item key.
Instructions
Delete an item.
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| req | Yes |
Output Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Remove a specified Zotero item from the library using its unique item key.
Delete an item.
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| req | Yes |
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
| result | Yes |
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations provided, and the description does not disclose any behavioral traits (e.g., permanent deletion, trash behavior, permissions needed, cascading effects). The agent is left guessing about the mutation's impact.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
The description is extremely concise, with zero wasted words. It is a single, clear sentence that immediately conveys the tool's purpose.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
Despite a simple delete operation, the description lacks essential context: what constitutes an item, whether deletion is reversible, any safety warnings, or confirmation steps. The output schema exists but the description does not reference it.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no value for the single parameter (req with item_key). The schema does describe item_key as 'Zotero item key', but the tool description fails to compensate for the low coverage.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description 'Delete an item' directly states the action and resource. It clearly distinguishes from sibling tools like add_item, update_item, and delete_collection by specifying the action on an 'item', matching the tool's name.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives (e.g., delete_collection, delete_tags). No mention of prerequisites, consequences, or contexts where deletion is appropriate or not.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nealcaren/mcp-zotero'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server