vibe_deploy

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

With no annotations, the description must fully disclose behavioral traits, but it only states that configs are generated. It does not mention side effects (e.g., file creation, network requests), permissions needed, or whether the tool is state-modifying. This is insufficient for an agent to understand the tool's impact.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single sentence, which is concise but at the expense of necessary detail. It sacrifices clarity for brevity, leaving out crucial information about parameters and usage. A better structure would front-load the purpose and then list key parameters.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given zero annotations, no parameter descriptions, and only a one-line description, the tool is severely underdocumented. An output schema exists but is not described. The description fails to provide a complete picture for safe and effective use, especially for a tool with 4 parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 0%, meaning the schema provides no parameter explanations. The tool description also fails to explain any parameters (ctx, project_name, files, targets). An agent has no way to know what 'ctx' or 'targets' mean, leading to likely misuse.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description explicitly states the tool's purpose: generating deployment configs for Vercel, Docker, and static hosting. This makes the function clear and distinguishes it from sibling tools like vibe_build_pro or vibe_code, which handle different aspects of the development pipeline.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no prerequisites, and no exclusions. For example, it does not clarify if this tool should be used before vibe_build_pro or after vibe_code, leaving the agent without decision-making context.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.