vibe_build_pro

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description does not disclose any behavioral traits such as side effects, idempotency, or cost. With no annotations available, the description fails to provide transparency beyond the sequence of steps.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single, efficient sentence that communicates the core sequence. While concise, it omits important details for proper tool invocation.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having an output schema, the description does not clarify what the tool returns or how it internally performs the 'build'. Parameters are poorly described, leaving an agent uncertain about usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema includes 'ctx', 'intent', 'template', and 'constraints', but the description offers no explanation of their purpose or expected values. Schema description coverage is 0%, and the description adds no semantic value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool performs a full professional build consisting of steps: upgrade design, architect, code, verify. This distinguishes it from sibling tools that handle individual steps. However, the term 'build' remains somewhat vague.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance is provided on when to use this composite tool versus individual tools like vibe_design or vibe_code. The description lacks context on prerequisites or scenarios where this aggregate is preferable.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.