get_tricks_by_category

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description states input validation ('Validated against known categories') implying possible error for invalid input. No annotations provided, but description does not mention whether the operation is read-only or any side effects. Could add pagination or return format.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Short and front-loaded: first line states purpose. Two sentences efficiently convey key information. No redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Output schema exists, so return format need not be detailed. However, description lacks details on error handling (e.g., invalid category) or expected behavior for edge cases. Adequate for a simple query tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema provides only name and type ('string') with 0% schema description coverage. Description adds examples and validation intent, but does not specify allowed values or format beyond the examples. Compensates partially.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states it retrieves tricks by category, with concrete examples ('pivot', 'slide'). Distinguishes from sibling 'list_trick_categories' (which lists categories) and 'generate_skating_combo' (which generates combinations).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use. Implied usage: use when you need tricks for a specific category. Sibling tools provide context but description does not exclude alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.