generate_skating_combo

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries the full burden. It mentions 'physics-aware' and the parameter range, but does not disclose potential side effects, authorization needs, or output behavior beyond what the output schema might provide. The tool is likely a safe generation, but more detail is needed.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise: two sentences covering purpose and parameter details. Every sentence adds value, and the structure is front-loaded with the main action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's simplicity (one optional parameter) and the presence of an output schema, the description is fairly complete. It explains the generation logic and parameter constraints. Lacking a bit on what 'physics-aware' entails, but the output schema likely covers return structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 0% schema description coverage, the description fully compensates by explaining the purpose of the single parameter (num_tricks), its valid range (1–20), and its default value (3). This is complete and adds significant meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool generates a physics-aware sequence of wizard-style inline skating tricks. The verb 'Generates' and specific resource 'sequence of wizard-style inline skating tricks' sets it apart from sibling tools that retrieve or list tricks.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implies usage for creating combos rather than listing tricks, but lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'get_tricks_by_category' or 'list_trick_categories'. No when-not or prerequisites are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.