list_completed_jobs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations provided, so the description carries full burden. It states it lists 'successfully completed' jobs but does not disclose behavior traits like pagination, ordering, default limit (50), or whether the operation is read-only (implied but not explicit). Lacks transparency for a list operation.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Single sentence, no redundant information. Front-loaded with the key action and resource. Could be improved by structuring into context and behavior, but remains efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With 4 parameters and no output schema, the description should provide more context about return format, pagination, or default behavior (e.g., limit default 50). The tool is moderately complex but the description is minimal, leaving gaps for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with descriptive parameter names (dateFrom, dateTo, jobType, limit) and descriptions, so the added value from the description is minimal. The description mentions 'time range' but does not elaborate on parameter formats or constraints beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states the tool lists 'successfully completed iSuite jobs within a time range', specifying verb (list), resource (completed jobs), and scope (time range). The word 'successfully' distinguishes it from siblings like list_failed_jobs.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, but the presence of sibling tools (list_failed_jobs, list_running_jobs) implies it's for completed jobs only. The description does not mention prerequisites or alternatives.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.