Skip to main content
Glama
navin2031992

iSuite Operations MCP Server

by navin2031992
OverviewSchemaSourceRelated ServersDiscussionsAdmin
TypeScript
Remote

Related Servers

Alternatives to iSuite Operations MCP Server

No user-submitted related servers found.

    Related Servers

    • Nova MFI – Mifos System Doctor

      Chrl3y
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides 50+ tools for audit, repair, notifications, GL posting, reporting, and complete Fineract administration — all accessible from any MCP-compatible AI client.
      -

    • MCP Ambassador Server

      mcpambassador
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Centralized authentication, authorization, and audit for MCP tools. One server governs every downstream MCP your organization uses.
      3
      Apache 2.0

    • QuickBase MCP Server

      LawrenceCirillo
      A
      license
      B
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      A Model Context Protocol server that provides comprehensive control over QuickBase operations, allowing users to manage applications, tables, fields, records, and relationships through MCP tools.
      26
      5
      MIT

    • MCP Store

      Meir83
      A
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      C
      maintenance
      A comprehensive MCP server for IT, DBA, and developer tasks, enabling error resolution, task automation, performance monitoring, automated documentation, and configuration management.
      2
      ISC

    • Looker Admin MCP

      kokevidaurre
      F
      license
      Not graded
      quality
      D
      maintenance
      Provides over 60 administrative tools for managing users, groups, roles, schedules, alerts, and content access within Looker through the Model Context Protocol. It enables full administration of Looker environments, including permission management and system configuration.
      1
      -
    Deploy Server
    RayrunBuild, deploy, and operate MCP servers without becoming an infrastructure team.ray.runAd

    TDQS

    B3.3/5.0

    Scored across 48 tools

    Disambiguation4/5

    Tools are generally distinct, with clear descriptions differentiating similar operations like cancel_job vs cancel_batch and list_completed_jobs vs list_failed_jobs. A few pairs could cause confusion if descriptions are skimmed, but overall separation is good.

    Naming Consistency5/5

    All tools follow a consistent verb_noun (or verb_noun_noun) pattern in snake_case, e.g., create_user, disable_schedule, export_audit_trail. No mixing of conventions, making names predictable and easy to parse.

    Tool Count2/5

    With 48 tools, the count is excessive per the calibration (25+ being too many). While the server covers multiple subdomains, the sheer number risks overwhelming agents and suggests unnecessary granularity.

    Completeness3/5

    The server covers user management, jobs, batches, schedules, audit, and configuration, but notable CRUD gaps exist: no create_job, create_batch, or create_schedule. Lifecycle operations are missing for key resources, limiting full workflow coverage.

    Maintenance

    ActivityInactive
    ResponsivenessNo issues

    Resources