Anki MCP Server
Related Servers
Alternatives to Anki MCP Server
No user-submitted related servers found.
Related Servers
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that allows LLMs to interact with Anki flashcard software, enabling functions like creating decks, adding notes, searching cards, and managing flashcard content through natural language.250 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityCmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server for managing Anki flashcards via AnkiConnect, enabling AI assistants to create, read, and update cards.810 npmMIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that integrates with Anki flashcard application, allowing LLM applications like Claude to interact with your Anki decks and cards.11250 npm1MIT
- AlicenseBqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables interaction with Anki flashcards through AnkiConnect, providing organized tools for managing decks, notes, cards, models, and media files.407MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that bridges Claude AI with Anki flashcard app, allowing users to create and manage flashcards using natural language commands.9MIT
- AlicenseNot gradedqualityDmaintenanceA Model Context Protocol server that enables language models to interact with Anki flashcard decks programmatically, with specialized features for Japanese language learning including vocabulary import, sample sentence generation, and spaced repetition review.3MIT
TDQS
Scored across 16 tools
Each tool targets a distinct resource+action, and descriptions explicitly say when NOT to use a tool (e.g. update vs inspect vs delete notes), which strongly aids selection. Minor potential confusion exists between anki_create_note/anki_batch_create_notes and anki_list_note_types/anki_get_note_type_info, but the descriptions disambiguate these well.
All 16 tools consistently follow anki_<verb>_<noun> snake_case (get_note_info, list_decks, create_note, add_note_tags, remove_note_tags). The pattern is predictable throughout with no stylistic deviations.
16 tools is at the upper end of the comfortable range but each earns its place across notes, decks, tags, and note types. Slightly heavy, but not excessive for a full collection-management surface.
Strong coverage: notes have create/batch-create/get/update/delete/search, plus deck and tag management, note-type inspection/creation, sync, and connection check. Minor gaps remain (no deck delete/rename, no note-type update/delete, no single-note get by search shortcut), but core workflows are covered.