getServerInfo
Obtain details about the currently connected Minecraft server, including status and player information.
Instructions
Get information about the currently connected server
Input Schema
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Obtain details about the currently connected Minecraft server, including status and player information.
Get information about the currently connected server
| Name | Required | Description | Default |
|---|---|---|---|
No arguments | |||
Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?
No annotations are provided, so the description carries the burden. It implies a read-only operation but does not explicitly state safety, permissions, or side effects. It is adequate but not detailed.
Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.
Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?
One concise sentence with no wasted words. Front-loaded with the actionable verb.
Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.
Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?
For a tool with no parameters and low complexity, the description is sufficient. However, it could mention what kind of information is returned (e.g., server version, player count) to be more complete.
Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.
Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?
The input schema has zero parameters, so description has nothing to add. Baseline score of 4 applies as the schema is fully covered.
Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.
Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?
The description clearly states the tool gets information about the currently connected server, using a specific verb+resource. It is distinct from sibling tools like getPosition or getNearbyEntities.
Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.
Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?
No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. There are many sibling tools for specific information, but the description does not clarify the scope or context for getServerInfo.
Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.
We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.
curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/nacal/mcp-minecraft-remote'
If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server